Two weeks ago, Igorots in social media exploded with
unimaginable fury – condemning the use of the g-strings and gongs in a recent
political protest. “They do not represent us!”, most kailyans strongly proposed.
“Our traditional wears are only used in celebrations. Those are not Igorots”,
our poor brothers were quickly disowned by their own Igorot kin.
For someone who once
performed in Panagbenga wearing my traditional wear, it will be a double standard
for people to cheer at me as a festival spectacle, but condemn me for wearing
g-strings to express my political views. Our Igorot hero Macliing Dulag
protested a damaging project using his ethnic garb with pride, same with those
other mountain elders in the past who opposed land grabbing and environmental
degradation. It only means; “I am an Igorot, and this is my political
sentiment”, and not, “this is a political statement of the Igorots”. Most of us
read the scene wrong.
How can we forget the Igorots’
history of dissent? From the Battle of Tonglo to Galvey’s conquest? From the
Spanish to Japanese Rule? How can we forget our history of opposition to oppression?
From the famous case of People vs. Cayat, when an Igorot was prohibited by the government
to get drunk, to the protests of Trinidad School (now BSU) students against
their exploitation as cultural entertainers for the Americans, to the number of
cases when our great grandmothers were jailed for simply harvesting sayote in
properties owned by the ‘crown’ (government)?
Why do we get angry when our
colors are worn by our brothers to express their beliefs, but we get delighted
when they are sold as a product or displayed as a fashion trend (or even used
as a table topper)? In the words of someone from Besao; “You cannot glorify
something as sacred, and at the same time sell them for profit.”
But I’m not a purist, my
background in tourism and sociology does not allow me to. To become a purist
and to be of this modern world is a paradox. The Igorots are not frozen in time
– can the Ibaloi woman in her smartphone know what it is like to carry a camote-packed
Kayabang and walk ten kilometers to get home? Can the young i-Bontoc guy in
Assumption know what it is like to carry the head of his nameless enemy to the
fires? Can the young Igorot today know what it is like to travel to the lowlands
to trade meat for salt? I doubt that. They can only learn the cultural
constructs, the tools; language, cultural dances, symbols. They can only wear
their names and their ethnic wears. But beyond that, they have changed.The
world before is different from the world today. The Ibaloi child in the past,
admonished for simply beating the gong; “ngantoy, wara in-partian mo?”, is now
encouraged to learn the tradition to keep it alive. “Entako men-gangsa” while
infusing country line dance in the routine is now accepted.
Our traditional wears, as
part of our heritage, were originally used in every aspect of our ancestors’
lives – both in joyful celebrations and mourning, in respectful gatherings and even
in passionate protests, in the fields, and even in their homes. They wore it
because it is part of them. Ironically, the Igorots we judged for simply
expressing themselves as Igorots (though I don’t share much of their political
views) simply acted like the Igorots of the past.
No comments:
Post a Comment